From the archive, originally posted by: [ M McAllister ]
Ancient Village on Mississippi Coast Found

BAY ST. LOUIS, Miss. (July 27) – Archaeologists believe they have
uncovered evidence of an ancient village, dating to the time of
Christ, that once thrived along the shores of this bay town.

Some of the recently unearthed artifacts found in random spots near
the beachfront suggest a prehistoric village occupied about a
half-mile stretch between Bayview Court and the Bay-Waveland Yacht

City leaders are working with state and federal transportation
officials to cut a temporary beach road, while several agencies work
to rebuild the 30-foot bluff and the bay bridge.

By law, the Mississippi Department of Transportation could rebuild the
beach road over the artifacts, so long as the project doesn’t disturb
the historic relics in any way.

Buz Olsen, the city’s chief of operations, said the roadwork includes
replacing old water and sewer lines that for years ran underneath the

“We were disturbing the ground where these artifacts were,” he said.
“Our trenching for the new utilities may be as deep as five feet and
some of the artifacts are just four feet below the ground.”

Olsen said the only section of the project that could be compromised
is the laying of the utilities, because the digging required could
disturb the area.

“With the utility corridor, (archaeologists) are going to want to sift
through every piece of dirt,” he said. “Things like this have been
known to hold up projects for years. Hopefully, it won’t hold up the
temporary road and the beach project.”

The scenario will change if human remains are found.

Sherry Hutt, a program manager at the U.S. Department of the Interior,
said such a find could temporarily shut down the massive repair
project on Beach Boulevard.

“If human remains are found (on federal land) and there’s federal
money being spent, then you would have to stop activity immediately
and instigate consultation with the possible descendent groups,” she

Hutt, national program director of the Native American Grave
Protection and Repatriation Act, which regulates the return of certain
cultural items, said the stop-activity consultation period is at least
30 days.

David Seyfarth, a project engineer with MDOT, said neither the village
nor the archaeological excavation is likely to slow work on the U.S.
90 bridge.

Marco Giardino, an archaeologist acting as the city’s liaison on a dig
to preserve the ancient remains, said as many as 400 people may have
lived in the village, which was built in an area that was ideal for
prehistoric civilizations.

“That area was very strategic and would have allowed them to travel,
fish and hunt,” he said. “It’s on high ground at the entrance to the
bay, which would allow them to see people coming and they could defend
themselves a lot easier.”

Giardino said spearheads and pottery found in the area suggest an
Indian tribe established the village sometime between 200 B.C. and 400
A.D. The first sign of the ancient Indians was found while workers
were repairing parts of Beach Boulevard that Katrina destroyed last

Experts say the center of the village would have been somewhere around
the foot of the bay bridge, south of U.S. 90, where archaeologists
have discovered an Indian mound, believed to be a burial site.

Several tiny man-made vaults or pockets may have been cut through the
mound to bury the bodies of high-ranking village members and possibly
their belongings.

One reason the mound has remain unearthed for more than 2,000 years is
its lackluster appearance. At about 50 feet wide and less than six
feet tall, early French settlers likely believed it was a natural
ground formation.

For most of the previous century, the mound was covered by large oak
trees and hidden behind massive beachfront homes. Katrina destroyed
most of the homes in Bay St. Louis, including the ones that had
protected the mound for so long.

The mound is essentially off-limits to researchers because it sits on
private property, but a lot of the relics found so far have been
scattered through the village area.

If human remains are discovered in the village area, federal law
requires researchers to locate and return the sacred discovery to
whatever Indian tribe may have occupied the village at that time,
which could be a tricky thing to do.

Giardino said the hunt for exactly which tribe established the village
could last even longer.

“We know that the ancestors of the Choctaw Indians were here when the
French came, but whether they were the same group here hundreds of
years earlier, it’s hard to tell,” Giardino said.

However, scientists have located ancient garbage heaps,
archaeologically known as middens, next to places where they believe
village dwellings once stood. Archaeologists can often find evidence
left in a midden of what the villagers ate, which could give important
clues about the civilization.

MDOT archaeologists, who are leading the search for artifacts,
declined to comment on the work for fear of grave robbers and treasure

“We don’t need to call attention to it because of looters and we are
not able to speak to it due to federal law,” said Lisa Siegel, an MDOT

David Abbot, an archaeologist with the Mississippi Department of
Archives and History, which works as a liaison between local and
federal governments on excavations, said the finds would likely be
cleaned and stored at a federal depository, possibly the Cobb
Institute at Mississippi State University.

Bay St. Louis leaders have openly considered using the historic City
Hall building, which the city moved out of in the 1990s, as a museum.
Abbot said the Bay could work with federal agencies to have some of
the artifacts from the village returned for display in a museum.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “”

To post to this group, send email to spectre_event_horizon_group [at] googlegroups [dot]
com or visit

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to spectre_event_horizon_group-unsubscribe [at] googlegroups [dot] com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse [at] googlegroups [dot] com

Google Groups: